The Polymerase Chain Reaction or PCR is NOT A TEST it is a process and this is the first misnomer that must be laid to rest. Discovered by the late Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize-winning Bio-Chemist you can listen to him explaining his eureka moment and how he stumbled across this breakthrough in the interview with NobelPrize.org below. I have added a link to the full interview at the bottom1
So, during the statistical pandemic of 2020 this PCR process took centre stage as it was hailed as the gold standard of detection by the FDA, the CDC, the WHO and most Western Governments when in reality nothing could be further from the truth. It’s shortcomings in relation to Covid include:
It cannot differentiate between a cold, flu, covid or any other of the many upper respiratory infections;
It cannot differentiate between live or dead RNA;2
It cannot determine whether the RNA a person is shedding is contagious or not.3
So what was the point of using it you may well ask?
That is a matter for another time but for now let us look at another aspect of the PCR and that is the Ct (Cycle-threshold) or in other words the amplification rate of the sample. It is widely accepted within Scientific circles that once you amplify a sample beyond say 20 cycles, the results become less and less meaningful. During the statistical pandemic Governments were using Ct rates of 4o+!4 In the video below, Kary Mullis explains how you cannot mis-use PCR but you can mis-interpret its findings and that is precisely what has occurred over these past few years.
Was this deliberate? I’ll leave you to be the judge of that.
…..with PCR if you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody…..
…..it doesn’t tell you that you’re sick…..
-Kary Mullis-
Take a listen:
Another who championed the use of the PCR as the gold standard was none other that Dr Fauci and you can listen to what Kary Mullis thinks about him in the short clip below.
…..he doesn’t know anything really about anything…..
Kary Mullis on Dr Fauci
I have provided a link to the full interview with Gary Null5
Having addressed the origins of the PCR and it's unsuitability for the purpose of Covid let us bring matters more up to date. On 21st July 2021 the CDC issued the following notice:6
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.
In simple terms, on the 31st December 2021 the PCR was withdrawn from use.
One reason for this was due to the very high false-positive results that were being returned especially when running Ct rates of 40+. This was an issue that was highlighted by many at the very outset and those who raised such concerns were duly labelled conspiracy theorists. Given all of the above why did it take so long for the CDC to issue this withdrawal notice? The answer can only be theorized at this time.
However, even today, almost a full year after it’s withdrawal we are aware of many People still using a PCR to detect Covid and more worryingly still believing the results!
Collectively, we must strive to close this knowledge gap and this is why you will see a lot more share buttons on our posts and we urge every one of our readers to share the information with at least one other person so that together we can reach more people.
As a population we must re-learn the art of critical thinking and of questioning everything especially that which comes from Government. Their agendas and our best interests are not always aligned and we need to be more discerning in order to see where they diverge.
We have much more to share over the coming months so please keep sharing and spreading the word because knowledge truly is power in today’s propaganda-led World.