There were shocking scenes in the UK Parliament earlier this month when barely 20 MP’s out of a total of 650, bothered to attend the Covid-19: Response and Excess Deaths1 debate tabled by Andrew Bridgen (MP for North West Leicestershire (Ind)). This should tell you all you need to know about the state of our current Political system and what our supposed Elected Representatives think of us, We The People.
It is often said that a picture is worth a thousands words, well if this is true, contrast the screenshot of this debate (above) with that of the one below which may well have been in relation to the MP’s pay rise2. Whatever the subject matter, it could not have been more important than debating the serious issue of excess deaths that we are currently witnessing.
Quite staggering don’t you think?
If your local MP didn’t attend the Excess Deaths debate (I know mine didn’t) then I would strongly urge you to consider switching your vote at the next General Election.
Here are some pertinent excerpts from Andrew Bridgen’s address:
We are witnesses to the greatest medical scandal in this country in living memory, and possibly ever: the excess deaths in 2022 and 2023. Its causes are complex, but the novel and untested medical treatment described as a covid vaccine is a large part of the problem. I have been called an anti-vaxxer, as if I have rejected those vaccines based on some ideology. I want to state clearly and unequivocally that I have not: in fact, I am double vaccinated and vaccine-harmed. Intelligent people must be able to tell when people are neither pro-vax nor anti-vax, but are against a product that does not work and causes enormous harm to a percentage of the people who take it.
One does not need any science training at all to be horrified by officials deliberately hiding key data in this scandal, which is exactly what is going on. The Office for National Statistics used to release weekly data on deaths per 100,000 in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations—it no longer does so, and no one will explain why. The public have a right to that data.
First, however, I want to address the phrase “safe and effective”. The fear deliberately stoked up by the Government promoted the idea of being rescued by a saviour vaccine. The chanting of the “safe and effective” narrative began, and the phrase seemed to hypnotise the whole nation. “Safe and effective” was the sale slogan of thalidomide. After that scandal, rules were put in place to prevent such marketing in future by pharma companies, and they are prohibited from using “safe and effective” without significant caveats.
That did not matter this time because, with covid-19 vaccines, the media, the Government and other authorities turned into big pharma’s marketing department, and it is very hard now to hear the word “safe” without the echo of the words “and effective”, but they are not safe and effective. In March 2021, when the majority of UK citizens had already received these novel products, Pfizer signed a contract with Brazil and South Africa saying that
“the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and…adverse effects of the Vaccine...are not currently known.”
That is verbatim from the Pfizer contracts.
There is so much more.
I have provided a link to the full Hansard text here:
It seems that every piece I write raises more questions than answers and our Government and their agencies seem increasingly unwilling to address these issues and provide those answers. The next General Election is on the horizon so it is high time to consider how many of the current incumbents are fit for purpose.